The short answer is Yes. I had never intended on beginning
this blog on such a morbid note but I felt with the current situation regarding
Ebola spreading to western countries, I believe it is pretty relevant and hope
that I can provide a better understanding of the dynamics of the disease.
I have a fascination with diseases. By detaching from the
harm and suffering they cause, the way in which they interact to immune systems
and pharmaceuticals captivates me. I had always believed that when we feel
feverish due to illness, that was the bug causing us to feel unwell, but it is
in fact our body raising its own temperature to make it a less hospitable host
to the infection. Basically, we make ourselves ill. Now, at some stage I would
like to write short entries on other diseases and how they interact with the
body but as it is topical I will overview Ebola.
Ebola is a zoonotic virus meaning it reservoirs
non-pathogenic within a host before being passed to another susceptible host
for the virus to take effect. Ebola, amongst other viruses, are carried by bats
however, there has been little evidence as to why they are not affected by the
disease itself. Some hypothesis suggest that the rapid and significant body
temperature and metabolism increase bats incur during flight is adjuvant to an
effective immune response. Frighteningly, humans and primates do not possess
the ability to fend off the infection. A study in 2006 revealed that as Ebola
spread across central Africa, 90% of Gorilla populations were wiped out. At the
time it was also noted that the mortality rate in humans was 80% and
unfortunately, that figure has not changed.
The typical symptoms of Ebola after infection. As you can see it takes rapid effect and can be catastrophic. |
The disease targets endothelial cells (lining of blood
vessels), mononuclear phagocytes and hepatocytes. Upon infection, the Ebola
virus glycoprotein is synthesised and replication overwhelms protein synthesis
of infected cells and the host immune system. The glycoprotein also interferes
with neutrophil signalling further helping it evade the immune system. The
result is haemorrhagic fever with subsequent organ damage, leading to organ
failure and death.
There is currently no vaccine or treatment available against
the virus. This is not reason to panic as there are many labs all over the
world currently working to find one. Certain procedures can help patients such
as fluid and electrolyte balance to counter dehydration and the administration
of anticoagulants early in the infection to control intravascular coagulation although these treatments still do not guarantee survival by any means.
The best chance of fighting it is isolation and quarantine. The disease
typically spreads via fluid transmission, ie and infected bat’s saliva
contacting a hosts blood, introducing the virus (there has been instances of
bats dropping part-eaten flats and passing the disease to mammalian hosts that
way). At this stage there is very little evidence to suggest it can be
transmitted through the air which is in some ways comforting as airborne
transmission is a much more effective method of disease progression.
I hope the intent of this post is not misconstrued. I am
opposed to media derived scaremongering with little evidence backing up their
weekly “civilisation ending” catastrophe, be it war, disease, famine or
something more nonsensical. I merely want to provide a bit more insight into
the disease itself. I believe that if the disease is controlled properly then
we will not face any danger as a civilisation and as individuals in the western
wealthy world we should be relatively safe from contracting it (unless you
visit central Africa or get particularly cosy with bats). So to go back on my
initial answer to the question: in Scotland, we probably shouldn’t worry about
Ebola.
My only concern is failure to properly quarantine the disease. Aid and healthcare workers who have been flown back to america for better treatment could prove problematic if there is a breach in patient isolation. The recent story of 2 American humanitarians who have been released from hospital after receiving treatment with experimental drugs (http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/21/ebola-americans-released-hopsital-recovery-doctors) is also a bit dodgy. Releasing patients at this stage without knowing the long term effects could result in relapses of the virus.
Next time I plan on writing about more positive and cheery
scientific stories however I cannot guarantee the odd disease cropping up that
I find interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment